>>10788960That sounds stupid as fuck and whoever goes with it deserves to bomb as hard as possible.
The mere opportunity cost is detrimental to the company that makes the damn toys:
>Yes, let's waste resources, manpower and time making thousands of items that we know won't sell, not even if they were on sale for 1 cent each instead of making or increasing the bulk of the shit that (still) gives us profits or keeps us afloat!Probably because whoever retarded exec came up with the idea has never worked in a manufacturing process in his entire fucking life and doesn't even know its implications, but you are basically asking a company to register a net loss in its annual balance, which for any sane person would be simply unreasonable, unless there is more to it but I doubt it.
This makes me question: whatever happens to all that Hasbro shitty toys that nobody will ever touch even with a 3 feet pole? They get sent back to Hasbro? Do they recycle the materials? Or instead the retailers send it straight to the garbage? Maybe they donate them? Don't tell me that retailers are also required to keep that waste of space in their stock for a certain time.
