>>8750284I know you're just saying shit to get a reaction, but here's your (you)
but nah, I just don't think even tight clothes would look like that.
If they're gonna make a figure of a naked super ripped dude than it works, but that's not the case here. It would look better if they pulled back on the definition.
Look at this pic of flash Gordon from the comic. He's wearing a tight shirt and you can tell he's a buff dude, but you don't see every little muscle group, like holy shit.
Look at those figures, or most of the figures on re-used bodies that are in the Marvel legends line. These toys look like they're wearing material SO tight that you can see the serratus magnus and shit but somehow it's not tight enough to see nipples? Come the fuck on. Nothing can look like that. I don't give two shits about DC or Mcfarlane toys but their DC line of figures seems to not do that bullshit, so I at least appreciate that.
