>>10201061I mean, to be fair, it was 1997. It was an ad run in an already extremely niche toy collector's magazine, it had a set cutoff date, and it required people to both send in money (in fact, a lot more money than toys of this type cost in stores at the time) and take the effort to mail in the coupon. That's a lot of fucking hurdles to overcome, I don't blame them for trying anything and everything in their marketing lingo starter pack to try to drive sales.
Also, what's up with his belt? It's so fuzzy, it looks like black marker on felt. Why didn't they just use plastic? There is zero reason for that to be cloth goods.
