>>10571930>>10571934Definitely Junkman. Zat or Jin for the namefag. Possibly both, now that I think about it.
The third one is the shill I will avoid naming because I'm sure he searches threads for keywords and phrases that pertain to either him or the brand he adamantly defends, and I bet if I name him, this thread will be nuked and I'll cop another ban because he's friends with a trjannie.
I think this video broke someone's mind.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=SXBytF3TXjQ&feature=share9It's only a theory, but it lines up with what
>>10571906 was saying. About 3 years. And him being friends with a jannie would explain why Retroblasting threads rarely get dealt with but arguing with him gets you a ban.
It's only a theory, but if my comments disappear and I get banned, take it as confirmation I was right.
