>>11014995I wasn't aware it was now a paid for service, but thanks for the info anon.
>>11012796I don't have any experience with that exact model but personally I've always found Rivarossi to be very inconsistent. Some of their models are very good value but others can be absolutely atrocious. If they're reasonably priced and you feel lucky, you could go for it but if you have the option to see them in person first I would always advise that.
>>11012805A really difficult question to answer. I love all the wide variety of types that existed in the British pre-grouping era, so I'll say a Kirtley T class. The pics I have don't seem to want to send, so posting a random one instead.
>>11015525Neat pics anon. If you take any more you should definitely post them. Do you have your own layout as well?
