>>11023385Wow, you said a whole lot of bullshit.
First, yes, the breakage on the Microman figures is well documented, hence me being very specific about the plastics.
hint for retards who hate reading:
>the opaque plastic figures are as durable as the day i bought them long ago.Only the transluscent plastics had massive problems. Takara having shit sculptors doesn't mean their engineering wasn't fantastic, but that's just your cope, huh?
Second, rubbery plastic can hold sharp details as good as anything made of harder plastics. You have no idea of what you're talking about and your collection must be tiny, because there's tons and tons of toylines that prove that. 90s Spawn toys. GI joe from the 00s. GI Joe from the 10s. Acid Rain. Hiya Toys. McFarlane from the 10s and 20s. Mezco in the 00s and 10s.
I can go on and on, because bendy plastic has been in use for decades by so many companies i can't help but think you're either a newfag or a massive poorfag. How the fuck can you miss all that shit?
Or are you just being disingenuous to try and have a point, like you've been doing for 4 posts now? So many goalpost movements and nuh uhs, like ignoring the range of motion on the Acid Rain figures being amazing, because you want to nitpick their single jointed elbow... despite it providing better than most single jointed elbows on many 1/12 figures.
Since you're a retard: there's no reason a 1:18 figure can't be as poseable as a 1:12 figure, because most range of motion simply comes from cutting away the the sculpt. And as proven by Microman, their joints aren't any more fragile than 1:12 lines despite having way smaller pegs and pins... than even other 1:18 lines.
pic of those rubbery Halo weapons, which are as sharply detailed as the harder plastic found on the Dare body, if not more, since the gun has a shit ton of technical details not found in the video game, because the game used low res textures compared to the detail you'll find on the toys.
