>>11033245>>11033254>>11033278To be fair, one's a 3d render whose joints and limbs are clipping, with perfect lighting, made of polygons instead of molded plastic, and the other is a real figure where joints add height, width and depth to the molded pieces, plastic overlays aren't perfectly positioned because physicality is a thing, and unpainted plastic is going to look like plastic in strong lighting.
The sculpt looks identical, except for the 3d model looking girthier. Not sure if that's because they didn't anticipate for the shrink that comes from molding (~5%) or if it's just the camera lens. Could be both.
It's all super minor shit that i think you guys are overblowing because you don't like the creator.
... also, does any other company actually show renders to consumers that ancipate what it would look like with that shrink or do they just show the normal render and nobody cares enough to be super critical about the tiny differences?
Disclaimer: i don't own anything from this brand because all these figures are so boring to look at it. Just a passer-by because i saw some cool guns, which i wouldn't buy either, because i'd rather spend $100 for a Mezco figure or vintage McFarlane army figure for their much better weapons.
