>>11230600>Then why did you use it as your comparison photobecause a budget children's toy company did it better than Joytoy that makes $160 toys with 1990s Kenner quality colored plastic. Again, no one other than deluded fanboys who have hit rock bottom claimed Hasbro used it in this thread and i had to correct him, because he's a bot who can't actually see the photographs being posted.
>false equivalenciesLMAO WAT? Do you even know what that means? You're just tossing out words without understanding what they mean.
Literally two toys made of plastic and it's sad that a budget children's line did it better. Apples to apples.
Both are supposed to look like they're using GOLD and the children's budget figure is doing a better job at it than a $160 Joytoy figures. Apples to apples.
A budget children's figure that cost $4 [b:lit]shouldn't[/b:lit] have done [u:lit]anything[/] better than a premium collector by Joytoy that costs $150, but there it is.
>fallacious arguments... just more proof of bots who can only generate word vomit.
>ib4 you're not allowed to compare a budget children's toy to a premium collectors toyI shouldn't, but the point is a juxtaposition, that Joytoy's standards are so damn low and there's collectors who have hit rock bottom that they need to defend that Kenner quality colored plastic.
It's okay if a children's budget toy has shit paint, because it's a budget children's toy, but a premium collector toy that costs twice as much as quality Japanese collector figures? LOL, no, it's not okay.
Double LOL when a budget children's toy does it better.
Triple LOL when collectors are defending a collector company who fails that hard.
Quadruple LOL collectors got angry over that criticism.
This all adds up to the rock bottom mentality of the posters in this thread, and the fact there's so many retarded excuses and defenses is a correlation that should surprise nobody.
