>>11308059Oh yeah, I've got my eye on that set! Only hesitation is that I already have all 3 of the creatures in Lego form in one way or another. I have the original Jormungandr from the old 2005 vikings set, and I have the Fawkes set from Harry Potter. And don't even get me STARTED on the multiple dragon legos I own, lol!
>>11308075Yeah, while it looks cool and is a pretty creative version of a somewhat bland creature, it was a pretty disappointing set. My main issue was the lack of poseability. Sure, you can move the legs, but then the thing just falls the fuck down. :/
>>11308123Yeah, that set came out when I was in College, and wasn't collecting at the time. Really wish I could have gotten it though! As mentioned, I DO have the foot long Fawkes set, which is pretty cool too! It acts as the center-piece for my collection.
>>11308156Oh yeah, like with the old Viking sets? Yeah, that was a pretty dope time! Jormungundr, (pretty sure I spelled that wrong,) is probably my all time favorite!
