>>11406447>Being negative in a review is a good thing for the viewerno, there's a difference between being critical and highlight flaws or things you feel are flaws, being negative just means you're being negative, and the way he goes about describing most "flaws" of Blanka and Sagat feels forced or very much just a him thing he tries to paint as a negative when it really isn't, because just as it's good to be critical in reviews it's good to be critical of reviewers when they doing things that feels off.
>>11406546>You're making mountains out of mole hills.maybe but it still just comes off as weirdly "I have to find something to be negative about" when a review doesn't have to be.
But yeah he is severely underestimating how good butterfly joints are and how little the sculpt break actually matters.
