>>11637476Those don't actually look bad, but I'm not interested in ST toys, just curious about what other folks like/buy. And what other companies make than the ones I am used to.
>>11637893>>11638732The one in Target looked fucking small. Those all look awful. I felt bad for today's kid to be stuck with this plastic crap.
>>11638131That's actually cool!
>>11638057That's a better size, and I guess if the small one is a baby, that could work. I don't remember them being inexpensive but it feels like something you should army build and that shit is never priced that way. Target had $9-12.99 stuff down to $5-7 for their current sale but you couldn't get everything you wanted to do something like build an army of Character X.
