>>5248947>No one called >>5247114 subjectanonBut that's me, you tard. learn how to read. like i said, why would i be arguing with myself? And since when do i ever bullshit? I'm pretty sure almost everything I've said is backed up by pictures of hilarious mushy, ill-proportioned, poorly painted toys. And that sure as hell aren't McFarlane's... well, besides the few that they really fucked up. Pic related.
But please, keep proving that subjectanon is just another term almost on equal footing as "samefag" and that people bullshit when they pretend they can "easily spot me"
>>5249071>Except the use stands and sticky tack to get those poses. What does it matter if a stand is used at all? Lots of figures can't be balanced because they're top heavy and not every figure comes with depleted uranium feet to retain a pose where they appear to be in motion.
The whole point to those pictures was just to prove they could do cool poses, not that they're well balanced (though some were).
Cool as fuck poses > mediocre poses needed to keep a figure balanced. And this applies to even god-tier articulated and poseable figures like Micromen, whose ball joints become loose as fuck and have trouble retaining poses even with stands.
Stands are included with most figures because they're needed, albiet in the most gaudy way possible.
