>>5290436DCC ≠ DC Unlimited ≠ DC Direct
cuz names r difrunt
>>5290436Quit being retarded.
All the figures they were making were already in production almost a year before they were froced change their logo. In takes a full year or longer to produce these toys. And EVERYONE who had been collecting DCD toys had bee noticing that they had been upping their game in articulation years before the logo change.
The change in name was just to capitalize on the logo change. Pretty smart, unlike DC Comics, but it's easy just to change packaging and pretend it's all new all different.... which i guess does wonders for tards like you, actually believing that they changed.
>doesn't know the difference between DCD and DCCOh please. Again, I'm not the guy who you said this to first and again, there is no difference. The fact that they added more articulation is only for the fact that they had been adding articulation for all these lines since before the change.
It's like saying Toy Biz changed their business model just because they started making super articulated Spiderman and ball-hinge joints to their 90s figures. Or that Hasbro changed their business model because they changed the engineering on their GI Joes.
Quit being stupid. None of these are what a change in business model means.
If DC Collectibles WEREN'T making collector figures anymore or releasing them to non-specialty stores like Walmart, THAT would be a change in their business model.
