>>5961469>Exactly. Wich makes a clear point that a line aimed at kids with a lower budged had better effort in the clothes than ones aimed to be bought buy adults with higher budget.Again, you're ignoring that they have two different purposes. The Style and Glam Luxe dolls were aimed specifically at fashion play, so people could mix and match all of the fashion pieces. The other, the Look series, is NOT meant to be a line of dolls with mix and match fashions, but dolls with specific looks--hence the name.
The latest dolls in the line, the newer $30 series, have included accessories similar to those featured in Mattel's Barbie-related social media--aka, nicer looking accessories that don't look like the chunky pink accessories sold for the Barbie playline dolls. They even referenced the "BarbieStyle" Instagram in the write-up for the first Look dolls to come with these more "collector" accessories, hence why all the phones have BarbieStyle Instagram on the screen. Most of the Look dolls are themed, so the accessories they come with center around those themes.
>So specific! That's why they all come with... Smartphones, hm?They don't all come with smartphones. What are you talking about? The Festival doll comes with a festival ticket, water bottle, camera; the tea party doll comes with a tea cup and plate, cafe menu, plate and pastry; the Party Perfect doll comes with a party invitation, gift bag, photo of her and Barbie. And so on. The themes are meant to emulate the BarbieStyle photos.
>A generic kind of (prop), wich adds nothing to said "specific theme--like" they are SUPPOSED to represent.Moving the goalposts.You said they weren't accessories. I pointed out how yes, they are, Mattel even agrees with me. So instead of addressing that you jump to something else.
I suggest you work on improving your English (and please start using spell check) before diving right into discussions. It would help you out immensely.
