>>6050842>Which one?There was more than one in the US?
It was a former reporter who blamed another reporter for his getting fired for reporting her as being racist that was likely imaginary, blaming her for him killing his cats and getting fired. Murderers just be crazy like that. Motives are crazy.
>for the majority of those cases it's usually underage kids that act on such violence.Yeah, and those kids will become adults who continue using the same media.
People my age dont care about online as much as i see with people even ten years younger. So you'll have people who grew up all their life with social media playing an important role in their life since they were kids.
They're not like me and you, they have different priorities and you may not think it important, but it's going to be that way unless there's another shift in society.
>Eddie as the poster child of everything that went wrong in the 90sIt's Cable.
Venom himself is a pretty simple villain, right down to his motives, and only his design kept him around to ever attain meaningful characterization.
Cable was that rebel that grayed everything, being against the good guys while also being against the bad guys. An anti-hero that became popular and other creators followed suit with their own characters.
Which isn't to say that they copied Liefeld, it's more like Liefeld showed them that there was a bigger audience for it and it ballooned from there. Venom himself followed suit by becoming an anti-hero.
And i don't think that's really a bad thing, considering that anti-hero phase allowed for more mature stories to be told... eventually.
Obviously, the precursor for the 90s going that way was Watchmen. So you can even blame Moore for what happened to comics in the 90s.
