>>6056516>You keep arguing that they have "extended range" that is hindered and act like it's a good thing.But it is a good thing. If it didn't have double ball joints and Figuart joints everywhere, the range from its joints would be even worse.
>Even if you hate one over the other cuz .... Maybe you should listen. I already stated the facts on why McFarlane's are better. More joints, smarter joints. More paint, better paint. Higher quality more detailed sculpts.
The fact that Mattel's budget on the toys is so low is why they're shit and look worse than even Hasbro's budget lines. The fact that people even compare Mattel's line to MCDonalds toys is because they share the same amount of paint apps.
>Why the fuck would I lie that I own both?Because that's what it sounds like, especially with the way you wrote that sentence.
>I liked the ball jointed toes but the Mattel has an ankle rocker that serves for same function. It's an exclusionary sentence. Saying "but" means the Mattel figure has it, but not the McFarlane.
And i hate to break it to you, but toe joints are worthless. They don't serve the same function, because the toe joint serves no real function unlike the ankles.
>When you don't even own a Mattel so you have no argument. I don't own the sun either, but I sure as fuck know that it's brighter than the sun. I don't need to own the figure ot see how lacking the paint jobs are, because there's dozens of reviews online and i can see the toys in stores.
I don't need to own the figures to read reviews say that some of the heads behave like they're only on swivels. How the waist doesn't seem to have any side to side movement. How the ankles, elbows, and wrists are only ball-hinges.
If I'm wrong about something, PROVE me wrong, instead of pretending that I can't judge something without owning a toy I'd never buy because of how poorly done they are.
I actually posted proof to prove you wrong about the joints. Do the same instead of making false statements.
