>>6065926Things might change and the previous results might be challenged.
For all we know, our universe could also end up being just a small marble in the backpack of a kid.
But until that happens, it holds no value, and until the current ideas are challenged, the dinos that are feathered and are known to have had feathers (not all) are more accurate when depicted with feathers rather than without, so there is no merit in this argument if you want to extrapolate it to argue that because our understanding and depictions of accurate dinos might change, we should just go with non-feathers right now.
