>>6109856Well, this is a strange comment. First, your comment assumes that kids would be aware of the difference between OG and licensed content. Then, your comment assumes that kids cannot have OG thoughts when playing with licensed content.
So, no you didn't fix my comment, lil man, you misinterpreted it.
The crux of my comment (as it seems I have no choice but to spell out for you, lil man) is that Lego should have not abandoned it's OG content. For the most part, I have no problem with licensed content making it into Lego.
