>>6172215Lemme offer an alternative view in regards to the whole Prisma thing. Prisma in and of itself, isn't bad and in some situations, it certainly helps your photos. Applying filters do not automatically make them bad.
Substance over style is good advice but it's not the end all and be all of things and sometimes, you really do need to use a filter/app to turn a "bad" picture good.
Not everyone has the setup necessary to take great pictures. A lot of us have potato level cameras and subpar lighting. Or we don't have enough space to take the photo without our personal belongings being visible in the background.
But even if you're able to take a terrific picture via a proper setup or replacing the background with photoshop, sometimes there's just no hiding that something is a toy.
Finally, it depends on what you're trying to achieve and how much time/effort you can afford to put into it. If you're going for a traditional photo, then go with
>>6172162 but if you just want something fun, then do what you think is appropriate.
I remember there was a Transformers photocomic long ago that used filters to hide the fact that they were ugly ass toys. The filters helped the suspension of disbelief and allowed the author to focus more on the story.
Now, in regards to your Spidey Lee pic... I like the Spidey. Prisma makes it weird but in a good way. Like those artsy caricatures. But the Bruce Lee just looks... I'm sorry, to me, it looks kinda terrible? This Prisma filter combined with Spidey's pose, eliminates a lot of detail which actually helps in giving Spidey weird caricature-esque proportions. But Lee's generally "normal" proportions just makes him look badly filtered.
