>>6249266As much as seeing the old classics getting love would be great, the one problem with them is there is really nothing that stands out about them for the most part.
Serra Angel, just a bland angel, I would love a classic angel figure don't get me wrong but nothing to really make people go 'OMG SERRA ANGEL' without reading the box.
Sengir Vampire: looking at the old art of him, what? just some bald probably shirtless pointy eared vampire dude? Updated art is a lot better, especially in this day and age of bestial looking vampires being a minority in media. He might even possibly be picked up by people who don't now Magic just because it is a fairly cool looking vampire
Shivan Dragon: Ok I will admit, despite how he is probably the single most generic dragon design in all of MTG, there is a severe lack of even generic dragons in decent articulated figure form.
Llanowar elves: The only one so far where not only was original art pretty unique for an elf creature, but the more recent art is still faithful to the tattooed head and mohawk tribal warrior theme going on.
Force of Nature: green mouthless dude for the original? Nothing noteworthy about that. Updated versions are just angry skinny tree men.
Prodigal Sorcerer: Wow, boring, just a generic blue mage.
Hurloon Minotaur: There is a lack of Minotaur anything toy wise, and the statue they made of him IS pretty badass.
Again, give me Llanowar Elves they are definitely one of the few old classic cards that not only had a very unique look but retained that look in new card art. And there is a criminal lack of good dragons in general no matter how basic and generic the design.
