>>6270266>That doesn't answer me what "Best Megatron" is defined as.That's because, brace yourself, there is no such thing. There is no such thing as "best Megatron" because, like so much else in this line and so-called "fandom", there's too many people with too many differing ideas of what is "best", to the point of being contradictory or outright incompatible to one another, that there will never be anything remotely close to a consensus on what "best" even means.
If it's not too complex, it's too simple. If there's not enough detail, there's too much detail. If it's not accurate enough, it's somehow TOO accurate. Too much paint, too little paint, legs too fat, legs too thin, he should have been a tank, he should have been a jet, he should have been a razor-spiked dildo.
You ask what "Best Megatron" is defined as, and all you will get is an argument with no end, because it's a question with no real answer.