>>6299624>So they make any shit up to prevent itSorta like how you you make up shit and append words such as
>likely becauseto prevent the requirement of facts and evidence to back up what you're saying? Anyone can push forward a bunch of supposition, but it takes someone with truth and facts on their side to put forth a solid no-frills argument. Jackman Wolverine was made. Mystique was tooled up, and the company flat out said that it was Lawrence that said no.
If a company just made up shit about an actress being difficult, you don't think that they could find themselves in trouble? They would throw an Oscar-winning actress with hundreds of millions of dollars to her name under the bus over a prototype sculpt that probably cost them less than $5000 in total costs at that point? Are you fucking retarded? Answer that point directly, how it would make sense that they would shit on Jennifer Lawrence in a flat out lie to save face.
And are you saying that a 20 year old company with over 15 years of experience making Select figures hand-in-hand with Marvel would be so stupid and inept that they would spend thousands of dollars gearing up a prototype, presenting it to the public, and creating press releases, without realizing that Marvel had apparently (according to you) been saying "no" for years on end during the supposed embargo drought? Answer that one directly, too.
I mean, Jesus, if you can tackle any one of those points without looking like a tinfoil hat retard nutball, I'll be impressed. But chances are you'll just say "but muh t-shirts" and think that it's a job well done.
