>>6322610figma bruce lee has worse anatomy and accuracy than any jakks
most jakks figures, while shit, use the 3D models to make their figures. So most are inherently more accurate to the source than plenty of figmas.
>>6322672LBW link isn't bad but the assymmetry and goofed inaccurate (mildly) proportions make it subpar imo. Also the skirt is garbage, makes any forward hip movement look horrible. SS link has horrible details and a shit facesculpt. TP link is all around no where near how the character looks, in any iteration.
Also things like the elbows on ss link and the knees on lbw link look and work like shit. That'd be a minor gripe if the range wasn't also bad on both. There's also a lot of inconsistent molds like PAKs for the PVC parts. I own 3 LBW links and each one has different torso lengths, ankle lengths, and shoulder widths. Granted it's not as bad as a PAK, it's still bad.
I just find it interesting that jakks are shit on while figmas are glorified. As far as sculpts go, they're pretty close in terms of proportion, paints are nicer on figmas and so is mold and assembly, but overall accuracy has never really been the focal point (aside from the new samus which looks damn near perfect) of figmas. And obviously articulation and joint quality is where figmas are the clear winner. But even then the figmas don't excel.
I call them shit because the proportion and anatomy issues seem consistent. It's pretty obvious to me that Masaki never actually learned anatomy, but also just ignores the proportions of most art for a personal take on it. I'm probably too hard on figmas, since plenty of other companies get their shit wrong, but I still feel like a really good SHF is significantly nicer than a really goid figma. Especially in terms of articulation, engineering, plastics and proportion.
>>6322312Thanks, I'll look into that, would love to see if there was anything else in that style.
