>>6338894>The characters are more accurateAccurate to what, exactly? G1? IDW? They look like representations of the characters, sure, but so do a lot of 3rd party figures. Otherwise, they don't really look "accurate" to anything.
>the transformations aren't needlessly complexA. You can't lump every single 3rd party company in together with transformation complexity. Some over complicate things and some are no more complicated than shit like Generations Springer.
B. They're also the same fucking transformation scheme copy-pasted across damn near every mold
>combiners are more stable than 3Puh-huh, sure they are, with all of that mold degradation and shit QC on the joint tolerances.
>The 3P combiners are shit.Feral Rex, Hades, and Poseidon beg to differ. Some are shit, yes, but again, lumping all of them in together is ignorant as fuck as each company does things differently. Plus, even in 3rd party threads, bad combiners do tend to get shit on for being shit.
>Gravity Builder bots that don't even look like the constructicons.Oh stop with this argument already. It's a different take on them and the fact that you can recognize what they're going for, then they clearly DO resemble the characters.
>>hollow>who gives a fuck. Are you one of those autists who wants die cast in everything?At what point did I say ANYTHING about die-cast? No, you stupid fuckwit. I like my figures to have some solidity to them with thicker, sturdier plastics.
>Weijing has this guy on the way who looks like he beats the MP hard>AHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHASo you don't have an argument then?
