>>6401159apparently at the expense of any packing materials inside a box way too big for the toy.
>who cares? The packaging is junk, you throw that awayIrrelevant. First off, if the person wanted it MIB then the box is massively damaged. Jackasses crying over MIB collectors is literally whining over first world problems that don't affect them in the least. Second, this kind of banging around not only crushes the packaging but also severely risks mangling the toy inside. I haven't opened it but I'm wondering if the contents in the bottom perhaps could be damaged.
I bought this as a gift for someone. Not only is it in bad visual condition with a crushed box, it might be broken, and oops, I have to give this to them today, even if I did initiate an exchange request that would delay delivery of the gift by up to a damn week, all because the packer was too lazy to add a few air bags they usually use.
The big insult? A few days ago I got a damn art portfolio folder with plenty of the air bags for packing, and that is sturdy enough to do without.
Nope, the big insult is I'm a paid Prime member and got shit like this. Why am I paying $11 a month for Prime if they can't put care into their packing? I could cut Prime and go back to ordering the minimum needed for free shipping.
I did fill in a packaging feedback, but I'd be surprised if Amazon even reads those or cares, since they've done this crap for years to various customers. They either use no padding or put the shipping label right on the flimsy packaging.
