>>6401549>generic realisticYeah, I think that's precisely what's wrong with it. It's generic realistic.
For example, take a mannequin with its vague features and dress it up. It'll look okay, maybe even really good.
But if you give it more pronounced features and a pair of realistic eyes, then it's going to look creepy and kinda disgusting.
Make a full on statue, made by highly skilled craftsmen, and it'll look brilliant.
SC Chun Li falls into the second category. It's neither generic nor realistic. It has realistic bags under the eyes and a pronounced nose, yet no cheeks. It's proportionally small if it's meant to be realistic, yet proportionally accurate to the cartoony source material.
>>6398974>>6398977Yeah, I think that's why there's something "off" about the figure in general. Even if we discount her "tired Chinese hooker" look.
