>>6453815>So you don't know?Sure I do. It adds playability the same way another other piece of articulation adds playability. There's a reason Hasbro doesn't sell statues.
>>6453817>If you don't bother doing your research and accuse me of arguing baseed on opinionBut that's exactly what you're doing.
>>Shifting the burden of proofI'm not shifting the burden of proof. You're the one claiming that toys without forced gimmicks sell worse. So I'm asking you to prove it.
> you're totally being reasonable here.yep
>They're about the gimmicks, first and foremost.Nope. It's about characters fans want. Look at POTP.
Terrorcons? Thing fans have been asking for for years.
Predaking? Thing fans have been asking for for years.
Dinobots? Thing fans have been asking for for years.
More fembots? Thing fans have been asking for for years.
Rodimus with winnebago? Thing fans have been asking for for years.
The entire thing makes it incredibly obvious they just looked at forums and collector wishlists for ideas.
>>Not using the internet you're on to verify anythingNow who's the one who's shifting burden of proof?
>>6453823>Tr legends have seats for the masters, anonYes, but they don't have the shitty head removing gimmick forced on.
They could have left Galvatron with a normal head but keep the cockpit for TMs to sit in. But they made the toy worse by shoving in the gimmick anyway. See where the problem is?
Now give me proof toys sell worse just because they don't have a head removing gimmick. Still waiting.
