>>6467722I couldn't agree more with this post. They're so uninspired, my eyes gloss over and go numb. After years of suffering all these years, I feel like I need to address why I dislike (most) of these photos:
First off, the compositions are all pretty one note (dutch angles) and too cramped to boot, with no good use of negative space.
The depth of field is all over the place, sometimes used to good effect, but most of the time half the photo is blurry, serving no artistic or creative purpose, ex.
>>6468093.
The lighting is also pretty bad for the most part, no creativity involved, just some fill lighting that blanket the entire scene. It's like white noise and really stale looking. The skeleton office photos show some potential though for creative use of lighting.
The outdoor photos look worlds better by comparison, but the cramped compositions still remain. Chill with the macro lens settings or pull back a bit to give your pictures some room to breathe.
You have some good ideas as far as subject matter goes, but it far outweighs your skill level. You'd benefit from some experimentation in different lighting techniques and composition. It also wouldn't hurt to use a different background other than white, though I've seen you use grey before and that was even worse.
