>>6487803You're dumb, dude.
You want to compare plastic types and consider soft plastics as being mushy? Go look at McFarlane's figures from the 90s and 00s. ALL of McFarlane's plastic was always super detailed, especially in his McStatue phase in the mid-00s and they were hyper-detailed as fuck while being rubbery.
>All the details are all muddy. This is not true at all. Go look at all the little circles on his armor and they're clearly defined, especially the smaller ones. The only thing that makes anything look soft is the paint apps, but as i mentioned before, the gun is the weakest aspect of the toy and you're trying to claim that's of higher quality.
Do you even know which plastics are more expensive? You're trying to claim VINYL is always recycled, just because it can be rubbery? That silicon is cheap?
Nah, you're just a dumb kid who probably thinks diecast is expensive because it's super hard made of super duper expensive high quality metal that totally costs more than plastic.
pic of McFarlane's crazy detailed rubbery toy, because Blizzard's stuff is all cartoony and not hyper detailed
