>>6570758>They actually got the shape of the face rightEven if they did, the paint sucks, which makes the sculpt worthless. A masterwork of sculpt is completely pointless if the paintjob is crap, and SC's Chunners certainly ain't a masterwork.
>but it sure as fuck isn't the same style, just like the FiguartsGee, it's almost like Chun-Li has several different styles/looks and varies heavily from depiction to depiction! Who'da thunk it?
>This is the base goal that most collector companies strive for. Sorry if you have low expectations and your favorite company can't do it.Or maybe, you know, toys should be good toys first and foremost. I don't care if it's sculpted and painted by a master, if the articulation, materials or QC are garbage then the toy is garbage. If you care that much about MUH SCULPT over a toy actually being fun or well made, then you should just collect statueshit.
>This Microman is also highly poseable, more than the majority of all Figuarts and is very well made, so its totally up to your standardsNobody is saying it isn't. But it's a completely different scale to the Figuarts and fills a different niche, thus is irrelevant to the conversation.
But let's be real, the only reason you're this determined to shit-talk the SHF is because of your irrational hatred of Bandai. They could make the best toy ever made in the history of man and you'd still find a reason to hate it and insist the alternative was better.
