>>6600586>Cybertronian designs are alien spaceships. Yes, fictional aliens designed by humans, thus held to our design standards.
>Nobody knows what alien spaceships are like, nobody knows if alien spaceships are even a thing.Yes, real spaceships, not the Cybertronian ones currently under discussion.
>Because YOU think it should look like Cybertronian seekers, because YOU think it should be a machine, because YOU think it should look functional from a human standpoint doesn't mean it's the same for everyone and more importantly, it doesn't mean you're right.Well, considering that the anon who misunderstands the definition of "abstract" and I are both assumingly human, we are well justified in holding these fictional alien ships, designed by human artists, to human designs standards. Now, unless the other anon is actually a Cybertronian behind his screen, you argument that we shouldn't hold alien ships, fictional ones designed by human artists, mind you, to human design standards holds no ground.
>As long as something hasn't been universally defined, and as far as I know, alien spaceships haven't, it IS abstract. Except they more or less have, at least by pop culture/scifi standards.