>>6889840No it isn't you gibbering sycophant, lets disassemble it point by point so your tiny brain can understand it without blowing an autism fuse.
>1.Meteor is a step back with partsforming nullrays for no reasonThis is a non issue to anyone without the autism that requires you live off a government check, the original had partsforming as well, and as long as a toy isn't full of just swapping parts to transform, this isn't a problem.
>2.arms are too short,They aren't you can size up the images next to each other, the meteor is about the same size as the official release, if not a bit longer, the only difference is they are positioned slightly higher on the meteor figure, and again, this is still proportionate realtive to the figure and human anatomy which it is based on. If you're veering off this slightly then your'e going into subjectivity and that's retarded.
>3.hollow wings This isn't necessarily a bad thing, most likely this is done for upper body stability, as having heavier wings would most likely throw off the balance. I can't say for sure how detrimental it is to posing as the offical release can't do much other than stand up straight and requires a base most times.
>4.and really awful head-shoulders alignmentThis is either a bullshit proportional statemnet or a reasonable transformeation comment, I couldn't tell which it was because the guy doesn't want to have a conversation and would rather just start crying at the drop of a hat. If it's the former, then it's absolutely stupid and not worth discussing, if it's the later it's a fair point and one I couldn't contest without transforming the thing myself.
So now that that's done with the only positives it really has is the better head, and MAYBE the alignment point if it's not a poorly thought out throwaway comment.
