>>6966950>No, is just common knowledge that Mafex is not good, that they being good is rare likeI'm curious as to where you're both pulling this bulshit from. On /toy/ you can check the archives and catalogues, generally speaking Mafex quality is on par with figma or shf, there's been maybe two releases that had weak crotch joints or something, but most problems with them had to do with odd proportioning, or weird dot priunted faces, which nearly everyone has switched over to anyway.
Quality wise, the figures are solid, painted well, and if you like what you see there's no issue. As opposed to mls which are cheap ugly pieces of shit .
