>>7042532You're not even worth this (You)
You're the one moving goalposts. Sales numbers for the consoles have already been posted. Saturn and Dreamcast are dead last. They couldn't even make it to double-digit millions. That was the entire point of the conversation, that your retarded ass thought Tomb Raider and Resident Evil weren't associated with Playstation just because they were on different consoles, when the crushing majority of gamers back then had a PS1. Not a Saturn.
And how was nearly every magazine previewing the Saturn version of Tomb Raider if it only came out earlier than the other versions in Europe? And when the PS1 was outdoing the Saturn? How can you sit there and pretend magazines were prioritizing the release of a game on a struggling console over the hot-selling one?
And when did I ever claim Crash wasn't published by Sony?
And no, it's not like the Call of Duty example at all. Not modern COD, anyway. The simple fact is you can't rewrite History. Sega lost and the crushing, overwhelming majority didn't care about their 3D consoles. They cared about the PS1 and they heard the words "Tekken", "Tomb Raider" and "Resident Evil" and thought of Playstation.
Also, that pic is the most desperate example I've ever seen. Virtua Fighter is the deadest game compared to its peers like Tekken, Street Fighter and even Dead or Alive. The reason it has toys while the others have considerably less comes down to licenses and willingness to invest into that market
SEGA loves putting out toys of their stuff, even Space Channel has a figma. But it's asinine to try and pretend like those IPs and their consoles were anywhere close in popularity to other franchises and the competing consoles
You've grown delusional and close-minded in your old age and you reject facts by pretending that people who disagree with you are just "too young". You're a living version of 90's Nick
