>>7072237>>7072763I trained and work in the animation field. There's only so much you can do on the budget and timeframe you're given for a standard TV cartoon, so to have super dynamic action like this, you cut frames and rely heavily on smears. It's not ideal of course, in a perfect world we'd have incredibly smooth motion, but that takes time and money that we just don't have.
It's a choice between being ambitious and daring with what you're given, or sticking to boring/safe shot choices because you feel like you don't have what it takes to do it "right." I'd pick the former every time. Even if it's not perfect, it's a hell of a lot more exciting to watch.