>>7088457>They are both considerations, and arguably more important than being 100% perfectly accurate. They're toys, not statues after all. Nah, you're just being hypocritical.
Both the model and the Hasbro figure's sculpt are excellent. They don't have to be statues to have great sculpts, but you're trying to lessen that importance because you're a weeaboo and know that the other lines didn't do as good of a job.
And that's a laugh that you value articulation so much, yet downplay how the articulation on the Hasbro figure is probably like a few degrees of lesser motion. If they were to be graded, the Hasbro would be an A- while the Revoltech/model/Figuarts would be A+/A/A.
The fact that you place so much importance on the feel of the toy is a laugh, especially when you're trying to argue in favor of a delicate hollow model.
Your bias is heavily shown by how you choose to judge these figures and how you need to rationalize their metrics with hyperbole.
Without a doubt, you'll try to label me as racist or whatever bullshit you need to rationalize as to why I'd argue in favor of a great sculpted toy with a lot of great articulation. I've proven time and time again that i do collect any import as long as they actually created a toy that has a great sculpt and a lot of great articulation, hence my posting pictures of my Japanese toys that meet these standards and not shit ones that I'm shitting on.
Posting a strawman only shows that you have no real arguments and need to draw back into your imaginary world to feel better about yourself and your collection.
And if you're not one of these anons who do this, then i apologize, because it's hard to tell one anonymous poster from another, as especially proven by the anons who label completely random people as me.
