>>7145053Isn't that a bit pathetic you're, like, a 50 year old being rejected by 4chan of all places and you're still trying to be edgy to a bunch of people probably half your age over dolls cuz you can't seem to grasp the fact this or the bjd thread doesn't want to become your personal blog where you ignore all advice and twist people's words to victimise yourself?
>>7144849Mattel did several Wizard of Oz lines and the 75th Anniversary dolls are honestly the most screen accurate and well made dolls except some dolls have fucking glue head and Dorothy has a caveman brow. The second best line would be the 2006 Line of dolls though they use sculpts from Barbie's archive rather than custom celebrity sculpts, and Dorothy's dress is made of satin unlike the 90s Dorothy Barbie or the 2013 one. The 90s Barbie is nice quality clothing wise but the faces are very much "Barbie AS X" instead of being closer to the movie.
There's also the Mattel "Designer" Wizard of Oz dolls where it's inspired by the movie but in "high fashion" designs (though Dorothy just has a halloween style skanky dress)
Tonner has made some dolls too, as well Madame Alexander but they're both scales and prices I'm not interested in but hopefully that should help.
There's also the Oz The Great and Powerful dolls both by Jakks Pacific and The Disney Store though both lines fetch stupidly expensive prices even though Jakks Pacific dolls have fucked up heads and cheap clothing while the Disney Store dolls have bowed legs and badly sculpted heads with weird jawlines.
Bandai also did a couple of dolls to tie in with the "Legends of Oz: Dorothy's Return" if you want a more anime style Dorothy. Lacks articulation though but otherwise decent quality for a playline doll.
And Mego did a set of Wizard of Oz dolls in the 70s if you want the 8 inch figure scale, while Multitoys in the 1980s did a bunch of 1/6th fashion dolls though both are not... good looking either by sculpt or clothing.
