>>7240644>Changing the goal posts, I see.Whats it with you and goal posts? You're always talking about changing goal posts. I don't watch sports, and I only slightly understand what you are trying to get at every time you talk about goal posts.
>First you admit that you like them lighter because you think it looks prettier anyway.Yes, and? Apparently Hasbro, and their sales statistics agree with me since they are the ones that are always making them that way. Don't get me wrong I don't want them to look as white as Ariel, or Rapunzel, but I honestly think the skin tone they are using is fine.
>is white 90s park Jasmine okay because she shows her belly button? In part yes. Her costume, and her hair looked like the Jasmine in the film. If a character at the parks looks like the character in the film its a good thing. I also think the new Mickey mouse looks way to skinny, and I hate the new mascot heads they are using. I can almost forgive "Jasmines" new outfit, but taking the poof out of her hair is something I can't forgive. The new tiny wig looks horrible.
You're getting so bent out of shape about the new Hasbro dolls skin tone not being movie accurate enough, yet you say nothing about how they've added blue streaks in her hair, or how un-movie accurate their outfit is. Last time I checked Jasmine didn't have a design on her top or a dress over her baggy pants in the movie. Now you can rag on me all you want for saying this, but she also exposes a larger portion of her midriff in the film than they are allowing that doll so show. The worst part about that doll to me is her face mold. She looks like an alien.
As long as we are on the subject of skin tones is it just me or is the new Mulans skin tone too white? I mean shes whiter than Snow White right now, and that's just messed up.
