>>7247720So you keep on posting anecdotal evidence, not even photographic proof, and you're talking a specific toy released 3 years before the Alien Queen?
Nice.
Here's a review made 10 years after the Oafe review:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__Mlwc9kMwQHere's one 3 years lateri n HD:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPl6pJH9y0AHere's one nearly 20 years after the toy came out:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBsnk6BGJWgWant to see my anecdotal evidence of McFarlane rubber not rotting going into its 3rd decade of existing? check out
>>7247372I have 3 or 2 more where he came from.
Rubber rots, but these aren't rubber. They're silicon or some other rubbery plastic that got treated to withstand aging. Not everything is made the same, not even within the same company, where plastic formulas can change from year to year and even wave to wave.
Even then, how good or poorly it ages depends on how it's stored. Heat, air, moisture and other shit will cause shit to age faster, and even then, shit won't age evenly. Like some of my 80s Joes have snapped, while others have not, despite being stored in the same plastic tubs... but they'll all snap eventually.
And that Stay Puft? That's foam, right? Foam is worse than rubber when it comes to aging.
