>>7311264>>7311825that fully retractable helmet is pretty much completely impossible to do while retaining accurate dimensions of the movie. You would essentially need a curved slot that digs a quarter sphere directly under the head. That is a LOT of potential structural integrity issues that affect a large chunk of the torso as well as making electronic and action features like gears for the karate chop more difficult to implement if you have to move around that big slot all but dividing the torso in half.
The wings also are as far as I am aware, comletely impossible to make 100% movie accurate trying to retain accuracy with BOTH in movie functionality and in movie dimensions. The Toy Story Collection Buzz was able to attain a far better retractible wingspan then any other large sized Buzz, but not only is it still not 100% accurate in size they still had to sacrifice accuracy in how it looks when retracted. Instead of folding straight in, they pivot downwards as well at the same time
>>7311613>>7311172what bothers me most with this new design is the fact she is not the same sort of 'toy' as the other toys. She is a removable porcelain doll that was part of a Lamp. She has never been shown to have any natural articulation points as far as I can remember from the few scenes of her being played with as a toy. She always had the same static pose.
So how the hell does she get new clothes on? did she do it herself, because I can't see an owner doing it easily. Granted if that bandage on her right arm is a result of being broken it could have potentially been replaced when she had a missing arm to allow finagling of the dress.
Of course if the repairman is involved at all, I could totally see him stitching up a new dress directly onto her.
