>>7325766So we agree that it’s an ugly toy. It’s not even a human, count the digits. For all you know it could be a 1,000 year old sage being.
I didn’t even think of it being nude or that someone could see it as ‘lewd’, because I don’t think that way. It’s a plastic doll. I see it like I see the hundred other naked plastic dolls you find at any thrift store, except uglier. Sorry it bothered you bro but that might be in your own head because I didn’t post it intending to troll or to trigger some autist with ‘doll noods’.
>>7325510Yup, they aren’t cheap, it’s a bjd.
>>7325536Agreed. As a toy line, very ugly and soul-less.
>>7325683I don’t like them either, very bloated and deformed look.
