>>7370893>Wow, someone head is up his ass. No, it isn't because again fool you can't base entire statistics on muh caseYou you not understand the entire basis of this argument is observation?
Going store to store and observing how many of whatever toys there are, right?
An employee is going to observe more how long before certain toys sell, how much, how many come in, case numbers, ect, its not about ego, its about having objectively more info to make a more educated conclusion on.
Lets say a customer goes to 5 stores, and for a toyline only sees multiples of one figure, the rest all gone. every store has nothing but 2 to 3 of the same character.
and all the other customers who go to the stores see the same thing.
conclusion? this character doest sell, and the others sell more.
well then it turns out that the case numbers have 5 of that character and 2 of everyone else.
An employee would know better that that character is selling just as much, if not better, than the others.
Thats not even factoring in being able to better see how long between the toys are put on the shelf to being sold, and all sort of other information the customer doesnt see.
EVERYTHING in this context is based on observation, and an employee can objectively have more info to make a more accurate conclusion.
