>>7369985>Way more beynod that; Street Sharks, Mighty Max, Dino Riders, etc.And where are they? They're certainly not on the pegs.
>thinks a new family live action movie going to save Gi Joe50th sold, Hasbro explicitly stated as such, with them saying the only reason they didn't continue doing more of it, was because Toys R Us wouldn't buy more vehicles since they had trouble moving them, and due to the fact that the line was store exclusive to TRU, and had been exclusive with them since the 90's whenever the toy line would have no media presence.
Are you really dumb enough to believe that they're not gonna make more GI Joes?
>Look at SW, ML ,TF e, it the same thing.No, it's not all of those lines have shelf space. The target near me only has a single shelf for Mega Construx and doesn't even put anything beyond Halo figs on it. And all 3 of the Walmarts near me have similar situations. Yet all these retailers had large sections for SW, ML, and TF.
>>7369974>Hasbro will go under first.That'll never happen. Hasbro is trying to resurrect it's older properties such as MASK and GI Joe and move away from licensed material with movies, and Bumblebee was a success despite cape-shit fags on reddit trying to say it was bombing and writing articles saying as such, only for it make $455 million so far, with it not even out yet in countries like Japan and extended screenings in China. It'll probably make over $500 million by the end of it's run. The Last Knight made $600 million and that was a summer blockbuster with a bigger budget that cost almost twice as much as Bumblebee's, meaning Bumblebee technically is way more profitable.
There's rumors that Hasbro may either lose the SW license or renegotiate with Disney, because Star Wars has been more of a burden on Hasbro that they don't really need, when they've had record profits from ML and Transfromers, only for SW to eat up profits.
