>>7490542>His entire review system is based on what he likes, not necessarily what he thinks is *good.*You're retarded
This is how reviews work. You read what they say and THEN apply it to your own standards, because everyone is different.
>give something a perfect or near perfect score.Seriously, you're retarded. The guy gives something a 3 out 4 and you're "but dat's neer perfect! THE OTY ISNT DAT GOOD!!!!"?
When the grading system is out of 4, it's purposely vague. It's either bad, vaguely bad, vaguely good, to good. Which i think is ideal, especially when it comes to collectors buying something, because ultimately why should you buy something? It either tips to NOPE or YEP when it comes to a recommendation.
Still, who fucking just looks at the amount of points given?
Only illiterate fuckwits, like yourself bitching about his points rather than what he actually says.
Stop watching youtube crap just because you hate reading.
>the ironythat's a complicated word beyond your comprehension, considering no one is throwing out boogieman accusations at you and the fact that post led to the boogieman accusations being made
