>>7614554except that takes UV light, which is generally either the sun or CFLs, and it takes YEARS
>unless they're supremely shit-quality plasticLED bulbs which have become common should put out less UV- and any UV will also work on the packaging too. But if you can't display the thing, why even own it?
>>7614576Yes, me again. FUCK you. Too bad my views are more widespread than your pussy punk bitch ass can deal with, stick to your "one person boogeryman" and keep crying, then get punched, Milo-anon. You're losing and your SCOTUS cheat today is going to bring the ceiling down on your side HARD.
George Carlin POP when? Also a Denis Leary POP, because Leary > that lying sack of shit racist Bill Hicks and it would trigger more dumb motherfuckers than POPs usually trigger. Then give the sales from it to charity to make the Hicks fans even madder.
