>>7621879I can't imagine how stupid you must think anyone is to believe what you just said.
You tell me that you can see motes that are matte and the same shade as the surrounding area, but ~100 dots that are darker by more than 50% than the surrounding area is indistinguishable from a solid tampograph.
That's so pathetically funny i can't even laugh.
Shit, i MIGHT believe you actually leave your basement hideaway and saw a OPM figure at your local Gamestop or whatever and it may have motes larger than every picture posted on this board, but that low resolution shit you can physically count with your eyes in less than a minute without the aid of anything? Cringe comedy quality, bro.
You're only going to fool contrarians who will only agree because you're arguing against me.
You're just living in an angry little fantasy world, especially since you need to believe i'm using some ancient computer, because even my old ass Apple Monitor from 2001 was 1280x1024. i don't think Apple had anything in 2007 that had that low of a resolution except their ipods and iphone.
How young are you that your knowledge of resolutions started when HDTVs became popular in 2007? Or are you jsut a poorfag who only noticed HDTVs because prices plummeted hard in 2007?
