>>7615669Seriously, each entry into this series children's commercials of selling dumb dumb children's toys following Woody and his pals from Andy's Room as they fight assorted villains that were sympathetic up until they made an exception for Gabby Gabby who is a Stinky Pete clone. Aside from the sharp cgi, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of cohesion and ineffective use of how a toy should function, all to push the boundaries on believably to make actions seem possible. Perhaps the die was cast when John Lasseter vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; he made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion from the toys. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the movies were good though!"No!" The writing is dreadful; the toys are terrible. Even this half assed forky character is no more than a joke to the imagination of a child because it doesn't follow the strict marketability guidelines Disney sets upon Pixar ever since Monsters Inc. proved the company to be a reputable advertising franchise to get children in sets with their two dollar happy meals and cheap chinese plastics. Later I had read a review from infamous film critic, Armond White, who writes for the National Review. He mentioned a popular belief that celebrates what we think; cooperation, ingenuity, and simple values such as perpetual hope, is in fact infantile, towards a desensitized culture that became apparent back in 2010 when everyone bent the knee for Toy Story 3, celebrating the legacy of the franchise as an American constitution. Pixar continues to indoctrinate viewers into childish, compulsive consumerism.
