>>7845212I'm not the one who suggested it, and I'm not the only one who wants to try it or agrees with it.
>>7845280I only want to try and make the *brand*poster stay away.
>>7845341>I don't mind discussing "that brand" as long as people are open to fair criticisms of itPretty much this, but apparently it's impossible.
>I saw their Burning Godzilla 1995 figure at my local Target the other day, and it actually looked pretty decent aside from the weird high-gloss finish they applied to it.*brand* does wonders for the price point, nothing short of achievements each release, compared with competitors of even higher bugets, but that pricepoint comes with corners cut and I think their Godzilla stuff is where it shows the most.
>>7845460Search for the D'Agostini one, it's a magazine with part to build the 1954 Godzilla, full rubber body, metal skeleton and remote control, it's like 60cm tall and it looks like the most perfect iteration of the 54 design in figure form.
[spoiler:lit]it's the most expensive one too[/spoiler:lit]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rjyXrEKH4A>>7845755I honestly hope they do with the notoriety of shills they got.Otherwise it's just sad.
