>>8184323>Except the rate of breakage was much higher than 3-7% judging from the amounts of reports and coverage of the matter. Really?
Let's see the 3000+ people complaining, otherwise yours is nothing but anecdotal too.
>general consensus of the communityLOL
so basically, you ahve no proof but maybe a few dozen people who said it affected everyone because, just like you, want to pretend everyone had the problem or never bought into the lines. See pic on the logical fallacy you're trying to use.
>Do you know what anecdotal evidence even is?Ofcourse i do, hence wanting to see an actual factual source for anything you say or over 3000 people bitching to show it's higher reaching the higher end of QC defect rates.
My anecdotal evidence > your anecdotal evidence, because i back up my opinion on the matter iwth the fact that newcomers to the collecting world would more likely break lexan plastic over something from Mattel or Hasbro.
>Except for the fact that DCD outright acknowledged the problem Like i said, i can see how people could break that shit, because kids like yourself didn't get into buying DCD toys until they made something you recognized, instead of just boring uninteresting comic book figures.
Same plastic was used for years and years, on figures with tinier joints with barely any reports of shit breaking.
>Just because YOU didn't experience it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.Yeah, way to ignore the fact I've acknowledged the fact that lexan is a hard plastic that can break and that DCD themselves made the switch.
You're still a hamhands though for breaking toys that my nephews actually played with like they were toys.
