>>8158701I'm a regular poster in the fashion doll general and have been collecting for 8 years so I know what I'm talking about when I say you're full of shit OP.
>>8158779is right, Creatable World didn't sell; as of this writing you can buy them on Amazon for 50% off, that's not a good sign. Mattel is squeezing out another wave to appease the woketards, but it will be quietly cancelled once the internet forgets about it.
>The articulation is good and I like how it’s essentially a boy doll and a girl doll depending on how you dress them up.Not really, that level of articulation has been standard for fashion dolls for a while now, and Mattel's QC has been in the shitter ever since the end of Monster High so the joints may not even work properly half the time.
Also are you gendering clothing? That's not very progressive of you.
Woke toys don't sell not because consumers are bigoted but because the toys themselves are boring; creators are so afraid of not offending anyone that they forget to make interesting designs.
I've seen it time and time again; Lammily ("average" bodied-doll) IAmElemental ("non-sexualized" action figures", the Nu She-Ra dolls (I liked them but the market didn't) all failed to sell because they thought ideology was a substitute for good design.
Kids don't even want their dolls to look "just like them"; they want dolls that are colorful, have pretty clothes and long silky hair.
LOL OMG and Hairmazing fit this criteria, CW doesn't which is why it shelfwarmed.
